(A single click on the quatrain/stanza number (= weblog Quatrain number) or mesraa'/first line will take you to the quatrain/stanza)
D=Dashti; F=Forughi; H=Hedāyat; FG=FitzGerald 5th; S=Saidi
|
Qtn# |
1st mesraa' |
D |
F |
H |
FG |
S |
|
1 |
34 |
10 |
- |
75 |
||
|
22 |
22 |
44 |
85 |
66 |
||
|
9 |
97 |
41 |
- |
64 |
||
|
19 |
31 |
11 |
86 |
35 |
||
|
37 |
50 |
581 |
cf. 19 |
86 |
||
|
62 |
24 |
62 |
cf. 23 |
93 |
||
|
16 |
113 |
115 |
cf. 3 |
26 |
||
|
2 |
14 |
8 |
- |
74 |
||
|
54 |
136 |
- |
- |
123 |
||
|
73 |
74 |
27 |
- |
113 |
||
|
66 |
69 |
45 |
- |
111 |
||
|
17 |
- |
47 |
63/24 |
88 |
||
|
62a2 |
152 |
64 |
- |
- |
||
|
40 |
164 |
67 |
- |
81 |
||
|
38 |
112 |
59 |
- |
87 |
||
|
57 |
118 |
127 |
- |
- |
||
|
47 |
127 |
93 |
- |
9 |
||
|
15 |
160 |
29 |
- |
94 |
||
|
48 |
53 |
95 |
- |
10 |
||
|
49 |
161 |
4 |
- |
- |
1 Hedāyat thinks it is doubtful that this quatrain is Khayyam's
2 so numbered by L.P. Elwell-Sutton, In Search of Omar Khayyam
A concordance of this kind is useful to me and may be useful to others, especially for those interested in FitzGerald's use of the quatrains and for the excellent translations of Ahmad Saidi. I am in sympathy with those who see it as useless, since it appeared that way to me before I could get the entries to find something approaching their proper place on this page. The fault is mine not Squarespace's.
Quatrains 21-40 lead with FitzGerald's adaptations and search, primarily through Heron-Allen and Arberry, for those quatrains which 'inspired' each of the stanzas listed by first lines below. References are also made here to the quatrain numbers used by Dashti, Forughi-Ghani, Hedayat and Saidi when they include a quatrain similar or identical to the Heron-Allen/Arberry 'source-quatrain.'
FG=FitzGerald 5th; D=Dashti; F=Forughi; H=Hedāyat; S=Saidi
|
Qtn# |
1st line |
FG |
D |
F |
H |
S |
|
7 |
- |
- |
- |
5 |
||
|
12 |
- |
175 |
98* |
16 |
||
|
13 |
- |
41 |
90* |
33 |
||
|
18 |
- |
7 |
54 |
83 |
||
|
20 |
- |
51 |
63 |
89 |
||
|
21 |
64 |
121 |
130* |
- |
||
|
22 |
- |
95 |
38 |
136 |
||
|
27 |
27 |
134 |
37 |
134 |
||
|
54 |
- |
- |
84* |
- |
||
|
55 |
- |
- |
77 |
- |
||
|
57 |
70 |
129 |
- |
47 |
||
|
63 |
17 |
- |
47 |
88 |
||
|
64 |
14 |
111 |
46 |
120 |
||
|
65 |
3 |
54 |
12 |
57 |
||
|
68/69; |
6/26; |
122/-; |
105/50; |
63/72 |
||
|
71 |
- |
- |
26 |
129 |
||
|
72 |
- |
48 |
34 |
71 |
||
|
80 |
- |
- |
- |
41 |
||
|
96 |
- |
63 |
35 |
140 |
||
|
100 |
63 |
2 |
112 |
15 |
Where Hedayat has a quatrain with an asterix, this means that he had doubts whether the quatrain was authentic Khayyam. This concordance will not be difficult to follow (it is my best shot for now in getting it to lie uniformly on the page). For the double quatrain 35, under 'F' (Forughi) you will read '122/-' ; the dash means that Forughi-Ghani do not include the second quatrain, and all other dashes in the table represent non-inclusion as well.